Tuesday, February 15, 2011

MTS partners Meru Cabs to offer free internet to travellers


MTS partners Meru Cabs to offer free internet to travellers















NEW DELHI Sistema Shyam Teleservices Ltd (SSTL), which offers telephony services under the MTS brand name, today said it has partnered with Meru Cabs to offer free internet services to its passengers in New Delhi and Mumbai.

The customer needs to ask the cab driver for an MBlaze dongle to get free internet surfing along with unlimited data download, SSTL said in a statement.

The company plans to launch similar services in other major towns including Chennai, Kolkata, Bangalore and Hyderabad, it added.

"Our partnership with Meru Cabs has been specially designed to offer seamless data connectivity to users on the go, both in Delhi and Mumbai," SSTL Chief Marketing Officer Leonid Musatov said.

MTS claims to have over 9 million voice subscribers in India and under the MBlaze brand provides mobile broadband services to over 4.8 lakh customers in more than 100 cities across the country.

Monday, February 7, 2011

The second wave : MTS India focus on Data...will it pay off ?

The second wave
Surajeet Das Gupta / New Delhi February 7, 2011, 0:45 IST

The question telecom experts are debating today is at what speed will the Indian consumer move from voice to data
All telecom experts today agree that Indians will increasingly start using mobile broadband services — on their smart phones, their netbooks, and their tablets. The question to which the telecom titans do not have any answer is which technological route the majority of Indian consumers will take to access mobile broadband. Will it be the 3G services being offered by the big GSM boys like Bharti Airtel, Vodafone or Idea? Or will they adopt evolution video data only (EVDO), the high speed data being offered by CDMA networks like MTS or Tata Teleservices? Or will they completely switch over to long-term evolution (LTE) technology — the 4G technology through which Mukesh Ambani wants to re-enter telecom.

That is the multi-billion dollar question. Multi-billion dollar because different players in the Indian telecom arena are betting those amounts on their chosen technologies — and hoping that they will be able to persuade the Indian consumer to choose their technology over the ones their rivals are offering. This story actually started a good 15 years ago. In July 1995, when the first mobile phone call was made in the country from Kolkata, no one had dreamt that this would alter the communication landscape in the country forever.
At over Rs 40,000 for a handset and equally expensive talk time, mobile communication was a privilege that only a select few enjoyed and many aspired to. But as service tariffs crashed and phones became affordable within a few years, a wave of consumers, tired of waiting in queues to get a fixed line phone connection, embraced mobile communication with great alacrity. And a communication revolution was well on its way.  
MATCH POINT
PLATFORM SPEED
GSM 9.6 Kbits/sec
GPRS 40 Kbits/sec
3G 1.8-14.4 Mbps
EVDO  3.1 Mbps
LTE  50-300 Mbps
Note: Actual speed could be much less depending on towers and number of customers
Eight years on, in 2003 to be precise, Mukesh Ambani tried to change the rules of the game by urging customers to shift from just making voice calls on the mobile phone to using data and internet on his CDMA platform. And he tried to do so through aggressive pricing. As part of his much vaunted “Monsoon Hungama” scheme, customers had to pay Rs 500 to lay their hands on a mobile phone bundled with data freebies like streaming television programmes, downloads of movie video clips and music and games to name a few.
The magic worked, but in part. Ambani did manage to rope in millions of customers. But his strategy to bring about a data revolution on the CDMA mobile platform, which would give him 30-40 per cent of his revenues, failed to take off as he gave away his telecom venture to his brother Anil after a bitter family battle.
As it turned out, for the bulk of the customers it was voice that reigned supreme. And despite over a dozen-odd mobile players in the market, real data services (excluding SMSs and caller tunes) currently contribute a mere 3 per cent to a telecom company’s revenue.
Game for more So did Mukesh Ambani misread the market? Or was he ahead of his times? In 2011, no one is asking those questions or doubting that a second revolution in telecom is well under way — with mobile broadband data ready to sweep customers off their feet. Telecom companies realise that voice is just a commodity in which margins will be under pressure. In such a scenario, the only way to arrest the decline in average revenue per user (ARPU) is to hook consumers on to data. Given that, the debate today is largely about the speed at which Indian customers will move from voice to using data on the mobile.
The change could be dramatic. Customers will soon be spoiled for choice with as many as eight operators offering them an array of technological options — 3G, 4G, LTE or EVDO — to get high speed broadband on their laptops and phones. At average speeds well above 2 mbps — nearly four times faster than what you are used to — consumers can watch live TV, make video calls, download music, make bank transactions and commercial deals, get online education lessons or discuss their problems with doctors sitting in another part of the country. Says Kanwalinder Singh, president of Qualcomm India, a key player offering technology for mobile broadband, “A data revolution, just like the voice revolution some years ago, is set to break out in India.”
More importantly, for the first time the gap in mobile technology offered by Indian companies and those abroad will be bridged completely. While customers in the country are at least four to five years behind in savouring 3G services, Indian telcos are expected to roll out 4G operations within a year of its global launch.
There are worries nonetheless. One, that the 3G services would be expensive as operators have paid staggering amounts for the spectrum — a total of Rs 67,000 crore. But if the tariffs offered by Reliance Communications and Tata DocoMo — players that have started offering services — are anything to go by, the fear seems misplaced. In fact, data tariffs that have been bundled with voice are highly affordable and even cheaper than 2G offerings for those who have higher ARPUs. The two operators have been able to rope in over two and a half lakh 3G customers in the first month of their operations despite that some killer services like video calling had not been activated for weeks due to security issues.
By October/November some of the broadband wireless access services (BWA) licensees are expected to offer 4G services through LTE technology which promises even faster data speed to many more consumers.
With Mukesh Ambani back in the game with a pan-India licence and spectrum for BWA, observers say he just might kick off another price war in the mobile data space like he did in voice in 2003. He will be at an advantage over his 3G rivals — he has got more spectrum (20 MHz) than his GSM 3G rivals (5 MHz) and at a cost that is fraction of what his rivals have paid. But he has a problem as well: The technology that he proposes to use is still under commercial deployment in some parts of the globe and its efficacy is yet to be tested unlike 3G, which is well established and has a large consumer base.
Still, to add to the good news for the consumer, if the telecom regulator and the government are able to push through things, there will be more spectrum available for auction next year for 4G services and another three to four operators can easily jump on to the speed bandwagon. Last but not the least, CDMA players like MTS are dramatically shifting their strategies by moving out of mobile voice services and pushing for data by offering EVDO dongles at high speeds that match those of the 3G players.
To make the data revolution a reality companies are together investing over Rs 1,50,000 crore. And they are doing so because they are sure there is a large market waiting to be tapped. Says Ericsson India Vice-president P Balaji, “In the next three to five years there will be a data market of 300 to 350 million subscribers. And we will see revenues from value-added services, which stand at 10 per cent currently, go up to between 25 and 30 per cent.”
Supporting the effort are device makers offering larger screens to push mobile data at affordable prices. So as Apple’s iPad made an official launch in the country last week, Samsung dropped the price of its Galaxy Tab to an attractive Rs 29,000 from a steep Rs 38,000 earlier.
Falling prices Will broadband wireless be dominated by GSM players like Bharti, Vodafone, Idea or Tata Teleservices that already have a large subscriber base? Or will the market be led by Mukesh Ambani who has no legacy issues or subscribers but a new technology that offers more speed than 3G but needs to be tested across the world? Or will it be won by incumbent CDMA players like MTS, which have the advantage of a pan-India network that others would take years to build?
LTE players have one key advantage — more spectrum at less price compared to their 3G rivals which helps keep costs lower. Says Kanwalinder Singh: “What this (more spectrum) means is that you can offer broadband to a larger number of people at speed similar to that of 3G but at a more affordable price because of the bigger volume of customers. Also it is possible for an LTE player to install a pan-India network with nearly half as many towers as would be required for 3G. And one can do that quickly by just leasing out capacity from large tower companies that have spare capacity rather than build it from the scratch.
But they also have many disadvantages — mobile devices on LTE are still not available around the world and most telcos are offering only dongles. Also consumers looking to use the device for voice won’t be able to do so. Until, of course, government changes policy and allows voice over internet protocol telephony between a PSTN (public switched telephone network) network and a LTE device. Currently, only device to device internet calls are allowed.
More importantly, prices of LTE devices, unlike 3G phones, will be steep — as high as Rs 25,000 which would be out of reach for most customers. In contrast prices of 3G devices are falling. Qualcomm, which makes 3G chipsets, is already working on smart phones below Rs 5,000. For sub-Rs 5,000 3G feature phones with speed of 3.2 mbps, Qualcomm has joined hands with companies like Micromax and Spice Mobile that offer such products.
Qualcomm’s Singh says that with more operators going in for LTE, the price of such devices should fall to, say, Rs 13,000. Also companies like Qualcomm are working on chipsets for mobile phones in which you can move seamlessly from 2G to 3G and LTE. The expectation is that the 5 MHZ spectrum with 3G operators is not enough and there will be congestion in such networks within a few years if not months. So 3G operators might have no option but to tie up with LTE operators especially in larger cities so that they can offer their customers high speed data services without a glitch.
Winners & losers But GSMA operators say they have at least a two-year head start over the BWA players. Says Samaresh Parida, strategy director at Vodafone-Essar, “BWA on LTE is still some distance away.” More importantly, they also believe that with more spectrum expected to be available in 2012 for auctioning in 4G, BWA players will cease to enjoy any special advantage.
3G operators are already honing their strategies to woo customers. Parida says that one large market which they will tap for 3G comprises PC users — over 35 million who use either laptops or desktops. It is also the market which Tata Teleservices is planning to concentrate on in the belief that at least 60-70 per cent of the initial revenue in 3G will come from dongles. Most of the dongle market is currently in the grips of CDMA players as GSM was not able to offer high speeds in 2G. But with 3G that has changed. To top it all, prices for dongles are sliding — it has crashed from Rs 5,000 to Rs 2,500 already.
Vodafone-Essar’s Parida says new markets will open up — one such comprises customers who want to use 3G devices but communicate in their regional language. With phone devices now available with virtual key boards on the screen, it’s easy to create key boards in different languages.
But 3G players are already facing a tough challenge from CDMA players who are increasingly shifting to data. Sistema Shyam which sells under the MTS brand, for instance, has dedicated half its spectrum to data and is pushing sales of EVDO dongles rather than just go for voice. The strategy is clear, says Vsevolod Rozanov, president and CEO of company. “Currently 10 per cent of our revenues come from data; we expect that to go up to 25 per cent by the year end. We have 4.5 lakh dongle customers already.”
Can he take on 3G operators? Rozanov says that he might not have the 3G spectrum but that does not bother customers because he ensures he offers them similar average speed. He also points out that he is well ahead of his 3G competitors in terms of network roll out. “We have four times the number of BTSs (base transceiver station or cell site) that 3G operators have. It will take competitors time to build a similar pan-India network.” Plus he is now coming up with MTS-branded smart phones which will be within Rs 5,000 for customers to do data on the move.
Surely, for mobile operators facing margin pressures, data revenues could change the game in 2011. And for Indian consumers the mobile data revolution could fundamentally alter the way they live and work.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Trai may recommend one-time fee for extra 2G :ET

Trai may recommend one-time fee for extra 2G

NEW DELHI: Telecom regulator Trai may recommend a one-time fee ranging from Rs 50.98 crore to a maximum of Rs 707.28 crore for every unit of second generation (2G) airwaves that incumbent GSM-based mobile phone companies have beyond the 6.4 MHz limit.

The regulator may recommend that 2G airwaves in Uttar Pradesh (East) be priced the highest at Rs 707.28 crore as this region holds the maximum potential for future growth, while spectrum in Jammu and Kashmir be charged the least, according to a draft report, reviewed by ET.

Calculations by ET reveal that if an operator were to have one unit of airwaves beyond the 6.2 MHz mark across the country, it must shell out Rs 8380.55 crore, as per the Trai draft report.

The move will impact Airtel, Vodafone Essar, Idea Cellular, Loop (in Mumbai), Reliance Communications, and state-run telcos BSNL and MTNL. The government may also apply this one time fee for additional airwaves allocation for new entrants and dual tech companies.

Currently, these companies have been given only 4.4 MHz of start up GSM airwaves in most circles. If Trai’s draft pricing formula were to be considered, telcos such as Tatas and RCOM may have to pay about Rs 15,000 crore each for pan-India airwaves to take their total holdings to the 6.2 MHz. These companies have been vigorously arguing that that mobile permits entitle them to a minimum of 6.2 MHz of spectrum and only allocations beyond this amount can be linked to a market linked pricing mechanism.

Last week, telecoms minister Kapil Sibal had said that the country will charge mobile operators for additional spectrum at market-determined prices as specified by Trai. Sibal was appointed in November to clean up the sector and bring about reforms after former telecoms minister A Raja resigned facing allegations of selling airwaves for cheap, causing a loss of Rs 1.76 lakh crore to the exchequer according to the national auditor.

Last year, Trai had proposed that GSM telecom companies pay for 2G airwaves beyond the 6.2 MHz limit in every region at rates discovered during the third-generation spectrum auctions. However, due to stiff opposition from the GSM service providers, the regulator said it would revisit the issue.

Under the new pricing methodology, since incumbent GSM operators largely have airwaves beyond the 6.2 MHz mark in the metros and category A circles, their outgo is set to be lower. This is because the regulator is of the view that incremental 2G spectrum is less valuable in the metros , more valuable in category A regions and most valuable in category B areas. In parts designated as Category C regions, the regulator in its draft report said that the incremental 2G spectrum beyond the 6.2 MHz would be about 2.4 times the cost of 3G airwaves.

While a mobile permit allows a maximum of 6.2 MHz of airwaves per circle, GSM operators cite subsequent policy changes that entitle them up to 15 MHz or units of airwaves in each region, and add that the legality of this policy change has been upheld multiple times by the governments and the courts. This is hotly disputed by CDMA based and dual technology companies such as Reliance Communications and Tata Teleservices who content that a mobile permit entitles an operator a maximum of 6.2 MHz of airwaves per region.

India’s national auditor, in its report, submitted in Parliament in November 2010, said loss to the exchequer due to allocation of airwaves beyond the contracted amount to nine GSM players – Aircel, Bharti, BPL (Mumbai), BSNL, Idea, MTNL, Reliance, Spice (Punjab) and Vodafone is Rs 2,561 crore, ‘based on the amount charged from CDMA operators for grant of GSM spectrum in 2007’. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India in its report also added that going by Trai’s proposals, the loss to the exchequer was Rs 36,993 crore.

Disclaimer

A BLOG FOR ALL THE SHAREHOLDERS OF SSTL (FORMERLY SHYAMTELELINK LTD) TO COME TOGETHER AND DISCUSS ISSUES OF COMMON INTEREST. YOU CAN REACH US AT AMSOST@GMAIL.COM